Discuss the drawback of the jury system as it is implemented in the UK The WritePass Journal

Discuss the drawback of the jury system as it is implemented in the UK Introduction Discuss the drawback of the jury system as it is implemented in the UK : 1). It is arguable whether this demonstrates the ineffectiveness of jury systems but it is evident that the Germans do not agree with them. Jury trials were also abandoned in India following the case of K.M. Nanavati v State of Maharashtra [1962] Suppl 1 SCR 567 where it became clear that juror’s decisions were capable of being influenced by the media and the public. As put by Debroy; â€Å"the Nanavati case was responsible for abolition of jury trials in India and it was the last trial by jury† (2009: 1). It was also identified by Debroy that there is a correlation in India between the abolishment of jury trials and the prolonging of cases (2009: 2). In view of this, it cannot be said that jury trials should be completely abolished in the UK as cases may actually be prolonged as a result and there are various safeguards that have been implemented so as to ensure juries are not being influenced by the media and the public (Rackstraw, 2008: 726). Therefore, whilst jury systems do create difficulties, it cannot be said that they should be completely discarded as a result as they are still considered a vital p art of the justice system. Furthermore, if jury trials were abolished it is likely that this would result in prolonged trials as is the case in India. Furthermore, judges would also be capable of producing prejudicial decisions, which would ultimately contravene Article 6 of the ECHR which provides for a defendants rights to a fair trial. In a study that was conducted by Sturcke, it was found that; two in three jurors did not fully understand the legal directions and that more than one in 10 jurors carried out their own investigations online about a case (2010: 1). This study was based on 69,000 cases over a two-year period, which highlights the injustices that can actually be caused by a jury trial. This seems to provide a strong argument as to why jury trials should be abolished, however problems will still be caused by judge alone trials. In effect, it appears as though there ought to be a balance so that juries do remain, yet where cases are likely to be prejudiced a judge alone trial should be conducted. Essentially, this is what seems to be happening at present as jury trials are being discarded in serious and complex fraud cases, yet whether this scope should be broadened to allow for their elimination in other cases is likely. This will ensure that juries are maintained, on the one hand, whilst also enabling them to be discarded in cases which would be difficult for them to cope with. Whether this means that there will be an effective jury system in place, is however arguable. Conclusion Overall, there are many underlying difficulties which emerge from a trial by jury, yet it cannot be said that they should be completely eradicated. This is because judge alone trials will also have many drawbacks, which demonstrates the need for the jury system to be maintained. In order to prevent unfair outcomes from being produced, it is therefore necessary that a balance is attained which could be achieved by removing juries from serious and complex cases and those which would have a damaging effect on their ability to cope. Referencing Baksi, C., (2014) ‘Bias has ‘significant’ effect on verdicts, jury research says’ The Law Society Gazette, Available [Online] at: lawgazette.co.uk/practice/bias-has-significant-effect-on-verdicts-jury-research-says/5039295.article [23 April, 2014]. Debroy, B. Nanavati and Jury Trials, Law Resource India, (2009), Available [Online] at: http://indialawyers.wordpress.com/2009/12/26/nanavati-and-jury-trials/ [23 April, 2014]. Doran, S; McConville, M. and Wilson, G. The Handbook of the Criminal Justice Process, OUP Oxford, 1st Edition, (2002), p. 379. Elliott, C. and Quinn, F. (2010) English Legal System, Longman, 11th Edition. Gastil, J., and Weiser, P., (2006) ‘Jury Service as an Invitation to Citizenship: Accessing the Civic Value of Institutionalised Deliberation’ Legal Studies Research Paper, 06-32. Gastil, J., Deess, E., and Weiser, P., (2002) ‘Civic Awakening in the Jury Room: A Test of the Connection between Jury Deliberation and Political Participation’ Journal of Politics, Volume 64, No. 2, 585-595. Herzog, F. Philosophical and Social View of the Jury: Could it Have a Renaissance in Germany? (2012) Available [Online] at: www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=RIDP_721_0553 [23 April, 2014]. Laville, S. Heathrow Robbery Trial Breaks with 400 Year Tradition of Trial by Jury, The Guardian, (10 January, 2010), Available [Online] at: guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jan/10/heathrow-robbery-trial-jury-twomey [23 April, 2014]. Lesser, M. A. (2010) The Historical Development of the Jury System, Kessinger Publishing: London. Lloyd-Bostock, S. The Jubilee Line Jurors: does their experience strengthen the argument for judge-only trial in long and complex fraud cases? Criminal Law Review, Crim L.R. 255, (2007). Rackstraw, M., (2008) In the Balance New Law Journal, Volume 158, Issue 7322. Sanders, A. and Young, R. Criminal Justice, OUP Oxford, 3rd Edition, (2006). Stone, J., and Dennis, R., (2003) ‘Race and Ethnicity’ Comparative and Theoretical Approaches, 1-7. Sturke, J. Jurors ‘struggle’ to understand judges, study finds, The Guardian, (17 February, 2010), Available [Online] at: guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/feb/17/jurors-judges-legal-advice-report [23 April, 2014]. The Auld Report, Review of the Criminal Courts of England and Wales, Chapter 5, Juries, Available [Online] at: criminal-courts-review.org.uk/ccr-05.htm [23 April, 2014]. Thomas, C. and Balmer, N. Diversity and Fairness in the Jury System, The Ministry of Justice Research Series 2/07, (June, 2007), Available [Online] at:   justice.gov.uk/publications/docs/JuriesReport2-07-webVersion.pdf [23 April, 2014]. Zander, M., (2007) a Touch of Bias New Law Journal, Volume 157, Issue 7295. Cases Condron v UK (2000) 31 EHRR 1 Jubilee Line K.M. Nanavati v State of Maharashtra 1959

New to Old SAT Conversion - Official Formulas and Tools

New to Old SAT Conversion - Official Formulas and Tools SAT / ACT Prep Online Guides and Tips As of March 5, 2016, the new SAT is out. This means that those who took the old 2400-point SAT may want to know what their new 1600-point SAT score would have been, and vice versa. This information is critical for when you research and apply to scholarships and colleges that use a different version of the SAT than the one you took. Here, we give theofficial conversionsbetween old SAT and new SAT scores. These conversions come directly from the College Board, and we've made automatic conversion tools to make it easier for you! Converting from Old SAT to New SAT Do you have your old SAT score, including the scores for each section: Writing, Mathematics, and Critical Reading? If so,just plug your current numbers into the left hand side below, and your new total will pop out automatically on the right! Enter your old 2400 SAT here: Old Math (max 800) Old Reading(max 800) Old Writing (max 800) Get new 1600 SAT scores here: Old Total SAT (max 2400) New Math (max 800) New Reading + Writing (max 800) New Total SAT (max 1600) // 800) { $(this).val(800); } var m = parseInt($("#in_old_math").val()); var w = parseInt($("#in_old_writing").val()); var c = parseInt($("#in_old_critical").val()); var old_r = w + c var old_total = m + c + w; var new_m; var new_r; var new_total; if (isNaN(m)) { $("#out_new_math").val(''); } else { switch (m) { case 200:new_m = 200;break;case 210:new_m = 220;break;case 220:new_m = 230;break;case 230:new_m = 250;break;case 240:new_m = 260;break;case 250:new_m = 280;break;case 260:new_m = 300;break;case 270:new_m = 310;break;case 280:new_m = 330;break;case 290:new_m = 340;break;case 300:new_m = 350;break;case 310:new_m = 360;break;case 320:new_m = 360;break;case 330:new_m = 370;break;case 340:new_m = 380;break;case 350:new_m = 390;break;case 360:new_m = 400;break;case 370:new_m = 410;break;case 380:new_m = 420;break;case 390:new_m = 430;break;case 400:new_m = 440;break;case 410:new_m = 450;break;case 420:new_m = 460;break;case 430:new_m = 470;break;case 440:new_m = 480;break;case 450:new_m = 490;break;case 460:new_m = 500;break;case 470:new_m = 510;break;case 480:new_m = 510;break;case 490:new_m = 520;break;case 500:new_m = 530;break;case 510:new_m = 540;break;case 520:new_m = 550;break;case 530:new_m = 560;break;case 540:new_m = 570;break;case 550:new_m = 570;break;ca se 560:new_m = 580;break;case 570:new_m = 590;break;case 580:new_m = 600;break;case 590:new_m = 610;break;case 600:new_m = 620;break;case 610:new_m = 630;break;case 620:new_m = 640;break;case 630:new_m = 650;break;case 640:new_m = 660;break;case 650:new_m = 670;break;case 660:new_m = 690;break;case 670:new_m = 700;break;case 680:new_m = 710;break;case 690:new_m = 720;break;case 700:new_m = 730;break;case 710:new_m = 740;break;case 720:new_m = 750;break;case 730:new_m = 760;break;case 740:new_m = 760;break;case 750:new_m = 770;break;case 760:new_m = 780;break;case 770:new_m = 780;break;case 780:new_m = 790;break;case 790:new_m = 800;break;case 800:new_m = 800;break; } $("#out_new_math").val(new_m); } if (isNaN(old_r)) { $("#out_new_verbal").val(''); } else { switch (old_r) { case 400:new_r = 200;break;case 410:new_r = 210;break;case 420:new_r = 220;break;case 430:new_r = 230;break;case 440:new_r = 240;break;case 450:new_r = 260;break;case 460:new_r = 270;break;case 470:new_r = 280;break;case 480:new_r = 290;break;case 490:new_r = 300;break;case 500:new_r = 310;break;case 510:new_r = 310;break;case 520:new_r = 320;break;case 530:new_r = 320;break;case 540:new_r = 330;break;case 550:new_r = 330;break;case 560:new_r = 330;break;case 570:new_r = 340;break;case 580:new_r = 340;break;case 590:new_r = 350;break;case 600:new_r = 350;break;case 610:new_r = 360;break;case 620:new_r = 360;break;case 630:new_r = 360;break;case 640:new_r = 370;break;case 650:new_r = 370;break;case 660:new_r = 380;break;case 670:new_r = 380;break;case 680:new_r = 390;break;case 690:new_r = 390;break;case 700:new_r = 400;break;case 710:new_r = 400;break;case 720:new_r = 410;break;case 730:new_r = 410;break;case 740:new_r = 420;break;case 750:new_r = 420;break;ca se 760:new_r = 430;break;case 770:new_r = 430;break;case 780:new_r = 440;break;case 790:new_r = 440;break;case 800:new_r = 450;break;case 810:new_r = 450;break;case 820:new_r = 460;break;case 830:new_r = 460;break;case 840:new_r = 470;break;case 850:new_r = 480;break;case 860:new_r = 480;break;case 870:new_r = 490;break;case 880:new_r = 490;break;case 890:new_r = 500;break;case 900:new_r = 500;break;case 910:new_r = 510;break;case 920:new_r = 510;break;case 930:new_r = 520;break;case 940:new_r = 530;break;case 950:new_r = 530;break;case 960:new_r = 540;break;case 970:new_r = 540;break;case 980:new_r = 550;break;case 990:new_r = 550;break;case 1000:new_r = 560;break;case 1010:new_r = 560;break;case 1020:new_r = 570;break;case 1030:new_r = 570;break;case 1040:new_r = 580;break;case 1050:new_r = 580;break;case 1060:new_r = 590;break;case 1070:new_r = 590;break;case 1080:new_r = 600;break;case 1090:new_r = 600;break;case 1100:new_r = 610;break;case 1110:new_r = 610;break;case 1120:new_r = 620;break;case 1130:new_r = 620;break;case 1140:new_r = 630;break;case 1150:new_r = 630;break;case 1160:new_r = 640;break;case 1170:new_r = 640;break;case 1180:new_r = 650;break;case 1190:new_r = 650;break;case 1200:new_r = 650;break;case 1210:new_r = 660;break;case 1220:new_r = 660;break;case 1230:new_r = 670;break;case 1240:new_r = 670;break;case 1250:new_r = 680;break;case 1260:new_r = 680;break;case 1270:new_r = 680;break;case 1280:new_r = 690;break;case 1290:new_r = 690;break;case 1300:new_r = 700;break;case 1310:new_r = 700;break;case 1320:new_r = 700;break;case 1330:new_r = 710;break;case 1340:new_r = 710;break;case 1350:new_r = 710;break;case 1360:new_r = 720;break;case 1370:new_r = 720;break;case 1380:new_r = 730;break;case 1390:new_r = 730;break;case 1400:new_r = 730;break;case 1410:new_r = 740;break;case 1420:new_r = 740;break;case 1430:new_r = 740;break;case 1440:new_r = 750;break;case 1450:new_r = 750;break;case 1460:new_r = 750;break;case 1470:new_r = 760;break;case 1480:new_r = 760;break;case 1490:new_r = 760;break;case 1500:new_r = 770;break;case 1510:new_r = 770;break;case 1520:new_r = 770;break;case 1530:new_r = 780;break;case 1540:new_r = 780;break;case 1550:new_r = 780;break;case 1560:new_r = 790;break;case 1570:new_r = 790;break;case 1580:new_r = 800;break;case 1590:new_r = 800;break;case 1600:new_r = 800;break; } $("#out_new_verbal").val(new_r); } if (!isNaN(old_total)) { $("#out_old_total").val(old_total); switch (old_total) {case 600: new_total = 400; break; case 610: new_total = 410; break; case 620: new_total = 420; break; case 630: new_total = 430; break; case 640: new_total = 440; break; case 650: new_total = 450; break; case 660: new_total = 460; break; case 670: new_total = 470; break; case 680: new_total = 480; break; case 690: new_total = 490; break; case 700: new_total = 500; break; case 710: new_total = 510; break; case 720: new_total = 520; break; case 730: new_total = 530; break; case 740: new_total = 540; break; case 750: new_total = 550; break; case 760: new_total = 560; break; case 770: new_total = 580; break; case 780: new_total = 590; break; case 790: new_total = 600; break; case 800: new_total = 610; break; case 810: new_total = 620; break; case 820: new_total = 630; break; case 830: new_total = 640; break; case 840: new_total = 650; break; case 850: new_total = 660; break; case 860: new_total = 670; break; case 870: new_total = 680; break; case 880: new_total = 690; break; case 890: new_total = 690; break; case 900: new_total = 700; break; case 910: new_total = 710; break; case 920: new_total = 710; break; case 930: new_total = 720; break; case 940: new_total = 730; break; case 950: new_total = 730; break; case 960: new_total = 740; break; case 970: new_total = 740; break; case 980: new_total = 750; break; case 990: new_total = 760; break; case 1000: new_total = 760; break; case 1010: new_total = 770; break; case 1020: new_total = 780; break; case 1030: new_total = 780; break; case 1040: new_total = 790; break; case 1050: new_total = 800; break; case 1060: new_total = 800; break; case 1070: new_total = 810; break; case 1080: new_total = 810; break; case 1090: new_total = 820; break; case 1100: new_total = 830; break; case 1110: new_total = 830; break; case 1120: new_total = 840; break; case 1130: new_total = 850; break; case 1140: new_total = 850; break; case 1150: new_total = 860; break; case 1160: new_total = 870; break; case 1170: new_ total = 870; break; case 1180: new_total = 880; break; case 1190: new_total = 890; break; case 1200: new_total = 890; break; case 1210: new_total = 900; break; case 1220: new_total = 910; break; case 1230: new_total = 910; break; case 1240: new_total = 920; break; case 1250: new_total = 930; break; case 1260: new_total = 930; break; case 1270: new_total = 940; break; case 1280: new_total = 950; break; case 1290: new_total = 950; break; case 1300: new_total = 960; break; case 1310: new_total = 970; break; case 1320: new_total = 980; break; case 1330: new_total = 980; break; case 1340: new_total = 990; break; case 1350: new_total = 1000; break; case 1360: new_total = 1000; break; case 1370: new_total = 1010; break; case 1380: new_total = 1020; break; case 1390: new_total = 1020; break; case 1400: new_total = 1030; break; case 1410: new_total = 1030; break; case 1420: new_total = 1040; break; case 1430: new_total = 1050; break; case 1440: new_total = 1050; break; case 1450: new_total = 1060; break; case 1460: new_total = 1070; break; case 1470: new_total = 1070; break; case 1480: new_total = 1080; break; case 1490: new_total = 1090; break; case 1500: new_total = 1090; break; case 1510: new_total = 1100; break; case 1520: new_total = 1110; break; case 1530: new_total = 1110; break; case 1540: new_total = 1120; break; case 1550: new_total = 1120; break; case 1560: new_total = 1130; break; case 1570: new_total = 1140; break; case 1580: new_total = 1140; break; case 1590: new_total = 1150; break; case 1600: new_total = 1160; break; case 1610: new_total = 1160; break; case 1620: new_total = 1170; break; case 1630: new_total = 1180; break; case 1640: new_total = 1180; break; case 1650: new_total = 1190; break; case 1660: new_total = 1200; break; case 1670: new_total = 1200; break; case 1680: new_total = 1210; break; case 1690: new_total = 1210; break; case 1700: new_total = 1220; break; case 1710: new_total = 1230; break; case 1720: new_total = 1230; break; case 1730: new_total = 1240; break; case 1740: new_total = 1250; break; case 1750: new_total = 1250; break; case 1760: new_total = 1260; break; case 1770: new_total = 1270; break; case 1780: new_total = 1270; break; case 1790: new_total = 1280; break; case 1800: new_total = 1290; break; case 1810: new_total = 1290; break; case 1820: new_total = 1300; break; case 1830: new_total = 1300; break; case 1840: new_total = 1310; break; case 1850: new_total = 1320; break; case 1860: new_total = 1320; break; case 1870: new_total = 1330; break; case 1880: new_total = 1340; break; case 1890: new_total = 1340; break; case 1900: new_total = 1350; break; case 1910: new_total = 1350; break; case 1920: new_total = 1360; break; case 1930: new_total = 1370; break; case 1940: new_total = 1370; break; case 1950: new_total = 1380; break; case 1960: new_total = 1380; break; case 1970: new_total = 1390; break; case 1980: new_total = 1400; break; case 1990: new_total = 1400; break; case 2000: new_total = 1410; break; case 2010: new_total = 1410; break; case 2020: new_total = 1420; break; case 2030: new_total = 1430; break; case 2040: new_total = 1430; break; case 2050: new_total = 1440; break; case 2060: new_total = 1440; break; case 2070: new_total = 1450; break; case 2080: new_total = 1450; break; case 2090: new_total = 1460; break; case 2100: new_total = 1470; break; case 2110: new_total = 1470; break; case 2120: new_total = 1480; break; case 2130: new_total = 1480; break; case 2140: new_total = 1490; break; case 2150: new_total = 1490; break; case 2160: new_total = 1500; break; case 2170: new_total = 1500; break; case 2180: new_total = 1510; break; case 2190: new_total = 1510; break; case 2200: new_total = 1510; break; case 2210: new_total = 1520; break; case 2220: new_total = 1520; break; case 2230: new_total = 1530; break; case 2240: new_total = 1530; break; case 2250: new_total = 1540; break; case 2260: new_total = 1540; break; case 2270: new_total = 1550; break; case 2280: new_total = 15 50; break; case 2290: new_total = 1550; break; case 2300: new_total = 1560; break; case 2310: new_total = 1560; break; case 2320: new_total = 1570; break; case 2330: new_total = 1570; break; case 2340: new_total = 1580; break; case 2350: new_total = 1580; break; case 2360: new_total = 1590; break; case 2370: new_total = 1590; break; case 2380: new_total = 1590; break; case 2390: new_total = 1600; break; case 2400: new_total = 1600; break; } $("#out_new_total").val(new_total); var old_to_new_error_payload = "Why don't the section scores add up to the total score? Summing ".concat(new_m.toString()," and ",new_r.toString()," gives ",(new_m+new_r).toString(),", not ",new_total.toString(),"! The reason is that the College Board has one conversion table for individual sections (like Math to Math), and another for total to total conversion. They try to make each individual conversion as accurate as possible, which leads to some inconsistencies. You can read more here.Long story short? Don't worry about it. These are only meant to be estimates anyway. The two totals are ",Math.abs(new_total-new_r-new_m).toString()," points apart - just split the difference and use that value for what you need."); if (new_total != (new_r + new_m)) { document.getElementById("old_to_new_error").innerHTML = old_to_new_error_payload; } else { document.getElementById("old_to_new_error").innerHTML = ""; } } else { $("#out_old_total").val(''); $("#out_new_total").val(''); document.getElementById("old_to_new_error").innerHTML = ""; } }); }); // ]]> New 1600 SAT to Old 2400 SAT Conversion Tool Alternatively, if you want to input your New SAT scores and get old SAT scores back, here's how to do it: Enter your new 1600 SAT here: New Math (max 800) New Reading + Writing (max 800) Get old 2400 SAT scoreshere: New Total SAT (max 1600) Old Math (max 800) Old Reading + Writing (max 1600) Old Total SAT (max 2400) // 800) { $(this).val(800); } var new_m = parseInt($("#in_new_math").val()); var new_v = parseInt($("#in_new_verbal").val()); new_total = new_m + new_v var old_m; var old_v; var old_total; if (isNaN(new_m)) { $("#out_old_math").val(''); } else { switch (new_m) { case 200: old_m = 200; break; case 210: old_m = 200; break; case 220: old_m = 210; break; case 230: old_m = 220; break; case 240: old_m = 220; break; case 250: old_m = 230; break; case 260: old_m = 240; break; case 270: old_m = 240; break; case 280: old_m = 250; break; case 290: old_m = 260; break; case 300: old_m = 260; break; case 310: old_m = 270; break; case 320: old_m = 280; break; case 330: old_m = 280; break; case 340: old_m = 290; break; case 350: old_m = 300; break; case 360: old_m = 310; break; case 370: old_m = 330; break; case 380: old_m = 340; break; case 390: old_m = 350; break; case 400: old_m = 360; break; case 410: old_m = 370; break; case 420: old_m = 380; break; case 430: old_m = 390; break; case 440: old_m = 400; break; case 450: old_m = 410; break; case 460: old_m = 420; break; case 470: old_m = 430; break; case 480: old_m = 440; break; case 490: old_m = 450; break; case 500: old_m = 460; break; case 510: old_m = 470; break; case 520: old_ m = 490; break; case 530: old_m = 500; break; case 540: old_m = 510; break; case 550: old_m = 520; break; case 560: old_m = 530; break; case 570: old_m = 550; break; case 580: old_m = 560; break; case 590: old_m = 570; break; case 600: old_m = 580; break; case 610: old_m = 590; break; case 620: old_m = 600; break; case 630: old_m = 610; break; case 640: old_m = 620; break; case 650: old_m = 630; break; case 660: old_m = 640; break; case 670: old_m = 650; break; case 680: old_m = 650; break; case 690: old_m = 660; break; case 700: old_m = 670; break; case 710: old_m = 680; break; case 720: old_m = 690; break; case 730: old_m = 700; break; case 740: old_m = 710; break; case 750: old_m = 720; break; case 760: old_m = 740; break; case 770: old_m = 750; break; case 780: old_m = 760; break; case 790: old_m = 780; break; case 800: old_m = 800; break; } $("#out_old_math").val(old_m); } if (isNaN(new_v)) { $("#out_old_critical").val(''); } else { switch (new_v) { case 200:old_v = 400;break;case 210:old_v = 410;break;case 220:old_v = 420;break;case 230:old_v = 430;break;case 240:old_v = 440;break;case 250:old_v = 440;break;case 260:old_v = 450;break;case 270:old_v = 460;break;case 280:old_v = 470;break;case 290:old_v = 480;break;case 300:old_v = 490;break;case 310:old_v = 500;break;case 320:old_v = 520;break;case 330:old_v = 550;break;case 340:old_v = 570;break;case 350:old_v = 600;break;case 360:old_v = 620;break;case 370:old_v = 640;break;case 380:old_v = 660;break;case 390:old_v = 690;break;case 400:old_v = 710;break;case 410:old_v = 730;break;case 420:old_v = 750;break;case 430:old_v = 770;break;case 440:old_v = 790;break;case 450:old_v = 800;break;case 460:old_v = 820;break;case 470:old_v = 840;break;case 480:old_v = 860;break;case 490:old_v = 880;break;case 500:old_v = 890;break;case 510:old_v = 910;break;case 520:old_v = 930;break;case 530:old_v = 950;break;case 540:old_v = 970;break;case 550:old_v = 990;break;ca se 560:old_v = 1010;break;case 570:old_v = 1020;break;case 580:old_v = 1040;break;case 590:old_v = 1060;break;case 600:old_v = 1080;break;case 610:old_v = 1100;break;case 620:old_v = 1120;break;case 630:old_v = 1150;break;case 640:old_v = 1170;break;case 650:old_v = 1190;break;case 660:old_v = 1210;break;case 670:old_v = 1240;break;case 680:old_v = 1260;break;case 690:old_v = 1290;break;case 700:old_v = 1310;break;case 710:old_v = 1340;break;case 720:old_v = 1370;break;case 730:old_v = 1390;break;case 740:old_v = 1420;break;case 750:old_v = 1450;break;case 760:old_v = 1480;break;case 770:old_v = 1510;break;case 780:old_v = 1540;break;case 790:old_v = 1560;break;case 800:old_v = 1590;break; } $("#out_old_critical").val(old_v); } if (!isNaN(new_total)) { $("#out_new_total2").val(new_total); switch(new_total) { case 400: old_total = 600; break;case 410: old_total = 610; break;case 420: old_total = 620; break;case 430: old_total = 630; break;case 440: old_total = 640; break;case 450: old_total = 650; break;case 460: old_total = 660; break;case 470: old_total = 670; break;case 480: old_total = 680; break;case 490: old_total = 690; break;case 500: old_total = 700; break;case 510: old_total = 710; break;case 520: old_total = 720; break;case 530: old_total = 730; break;case 540: old_total = 730; break;case 550: old_total = 740; break;case 560: old_total = 750; break;case 570: old_total = 760; break;case 580: old_total = 770; break;case 590: old_total = 780; break;case 600: old_total = 790; break;case 610: old_total = 800; break;case 620: old_total = 810; break;case 630: old_total = 820; break;case 640: old_total = 830; break;case 650: old_total = 840; break;case 660: old_total = 850; break;case 670: old_total = 860; break;case 680: old_total = 870; break;case 690: old_total = 880; break;ca se 700: old_total = 900; break;case 710: old_total = 910; break;case 720: old_total = 930; break;case 730: old_total = 950; break;case 740: old_total = 960; break;case 750: old_total = 980; break;case 760: old_total = 990; break;case 770: old_total = 1010; break;case 780: old_total = 1030; break;case 790: old_total = 1040; break;case 800: old_total = 1060; break;case 810: old_total = 1070; break;case 820: old_total = 1090; break;case 830: old_total = 1110; break;case 840: old_total = 1120; break;case 850: old_total = 1140; break;case 860: old_total = 1150; break;case 870: old_total = 1170; break;case 880: old_total = 1180; break;case 890: old_total = 1200; break;case 900: old_total = 1210; break;case 910: old_total = 1220; break;case 920: old_total = 1240; break;case 930: old_total = 1250; break;case 940: old_total = 1270; break;case 950: old_total = 1280; break;case 960: old_total = 1300; break;case 970: old_total = 1310; break;case 980: old_total = 1330; break;case 990: old_total = 1340; break;case 1000: old_total = 1360; break;case 1010: old_total = 1370; break;case 1020: old_total = 1390; break;case 1030: old_total = 1400; break;case 1040: old_total = 1420; break;case 1050: old_total = 1430; break;case 1060: old_total = 1450; break;case 1070: old_total = 1460; break;case 1080: old_total = 1480; break;case 1090: old_total = 1490; break;case 1100: old_total = 1510; break;case 1110: old_total = 1530; break;case 1120: old_total = 1540; break;case 1130: old_total = 1560; break;case 1140: old_total = 1570; break;case 1150: old_total = 1590; break;case 1160: old_total = 1610; break;case 1170: old_total = 1620; break;case 1180: old_total = 1640; break;case 1190: old_total = 1650; break;case 1200: old_total = 1670; break;case 1210: old_total = 1680; break;case 1220: old_total = 1700; break;case 1230: old_total = 1710; break;case 1240: old_total = 1730; break;case 1250: old_total = 1750; break;case 1260: old_total = 1760; break;case 1270: old_total = 1780; break;cas e 1280: old_total = 1790; break;case 1290: old_total = 1810; break;case 1300: old_total = 1820; break;case 1310: old_total = 1840; break;case 1320: old_total = 1850; break;case 1330: old_total = 1870; break;case 1340: old_total = 1880; break;case 1350: old_total = 1900; break;case 1360: old_total = 1920; break;case 1370: old_total = 1930; break;case 1380: old_total = 1950; break;case 1390: old_total = 1970; break;case 1400: old_total = 1990; break;case 1410: old_total = 2000; break;case 1420: old_total = 2020; break;case 1430: old_total = 2040; break;case 1440: old_total = 2060; break;case 1450: old_total = 2080; break;case 1460: old_total = 2090; break;case 1470: old_total = 2110; break;case 1480: old_total = 2130; break;case 1490: old_total = 2150; break;case 1500: old_total = 2170; break;case 1510: old_total = 2190; break;case 1520: old_total = 2210; break;case 1530: old_total = 2230; break;case 1540: old_total = 2260; break;case 1550: old_total = 2280; break;case 1560: old_total = 2300; break;case 1570: old_total = 2330; break;case 1580: old_total = 2350; break;case 1590: old_total = 2370; break;case 1600: old_total = 2390; break; } $("#out_old_total2").val(old_total); var new_to_old_error_payload = "Why don't the old section scores add up to the old total score? Summing ".concat(old_m.toString()," and ",old_v.toString()," gives ",(old_m+old_v).toString(),", not ",old_total.toString(),"! The reason is that the College Board has one conversion table for individual sections (like Math to Math), and another for total to total conversion. They try to make each individual conversion as accurate as possible, which leads to some inconsistencies. You can read more here.Long story short? Don't worry about it. These are only meant to be estimates anyway. The two totals are ",Math.abs(old_total-old_m-old_v).toString()," points apart - just split the difference and use that value for what you need."); if (old_total != (old_v + old_m)) { document.getElementById("new_to_old_error").innerHTML = new_to_old_error_payload; } else { document.getElementById("new_to_old_error").innerHTML = ""; } } else { $("#out_old_total2").val(''); $("#out_new_total2").val(''); document.getElementById("new_to_old_error").innerHTML = ""; } }); }); // ]]> More Information About Converting Between Scores When You'll Want to Convert Between Scores On one hand, the new SAT and the old SAT are different tests. No single test captures all the information from other tests. Comparing your score on the two tests is, in some ways, like comparing your marathon speed with your 100-meter-sprint speed. While the two speeds are probably correlated, the tests are different, and no one test fully summarizes the other. On the other hand, scores from the two tests are indisputably related. They both aim to test similar concepts, they have similar functions as college admissions tests, and they both keep some of the same multiple-choice features. If you do well on one test, you'll tend to do well on the other. Therefore,it absolutely makes sense to talk about converting between one score and another. The concept we use in the conversion above is calledtheoretical equivalence. That is, if you were to perform as well on one test as the other, what would your total score and section scores be? This gives us a formula where the math section remains the same, and the verbal sections map onto each other. You can use this conversionif you're administering scholarships or admissions and want the same standards across the board. If you're intuitively used to thinking in terms of Old SAT scores, this conversion lets you understand New SAT scores better. However, you should be aware of one caveat if you are using conversion tables to predict test scores. The caveat is that you'll experience regression to the mean. If you did better than average on the old sat (above 1500), you'll do just a tad lower than on the new SAT than your conversion chart score. Likewise, if you did worse than average (less than 1500) on the old SAT, you'll do just a tad better on the new SAT. The reason for this is that new test doesn't test exactly the same things as the old test, and for the new subjects being tested, you are statistically more likely to do more average. Thus, you should expect your score to shrink towards the average. What To Do Next? Now you've converted between the two scores, one thing you should very seriously consider is taking the new SAT. Even if you have an old SAT score, and you've predicted your new SAT score according to the above conversion formula, you will likely perform somewhat differently when you take the real new SAT. This is a good thing because, with superscoring, you have two bites at the apple and more chances to improve. Likewise, if you took both the old SAT and the new SAT, and found that your old SAT converted to more than your actual new SAT score, this is a sign you just had bad luck on your new SAT. If you take it again, there is a good chance you'll scorehigher! FurtherReading Wondering how many times you should take the SAT? Check out our guide and learn the exact number that's best for you! Planning on taking the SAT? Learn thebest ways to study for the new version of the SAT. Have you taken the SAT more than once or are planning on taking it more than once? Superscoring can be a huge benefit for you! Learn what superscoring is,when it's used, and how it can help you with college admissions. //

Public Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Public Law - Essay Example Between the 19th and 21st centuries, various changes have taken place and have ended up reducing the powers and rights bestowed on the House of Commons for one reason or another. Their mandates and membership have in the past been disrupted, and rearranged to meet the changing needs of the government operations in the constitution, and for the benefit of the general society. So far, the trend in changes being campaigned for and implemented on the House of Lords seems to be very thorough, and with a driven motive, especially from the running government and House of commons, which could not only affect their powers, but injure the public affairs and general society, when the operations of the common house are left with minimal control. Roles of the House of Lords Legislative responsibilities: As a constituent body of the parliament, it plays a major role in the law making process. Actually, of all the roles the chamber is entitled to, law making that entails amending, revising, and eve n initiating legislatures remain a critical role, which the house spends most of its time in (Parliamentary Education Service, 2007). This is usually a shared responsibility with the House of Commons, allowing each house to bring in their opinion and contribute their ideologies in the development of the law. The end product of the proposed law after having been evaluated by both houses, stands a better chance of been effective once passed through for the crowns approval. This is because the potential problems and voids in the proposed law or bills would be exposed and catered for. Initially, the House of Lords exercised more powers in the legislature, but the passage of the Parliament Act of 1911limited its power, over the ordinary legislature (kkhsou.in, 2011). Like the House of Commons, it can also initiate bills, especially those concerned with the government operation and non money bills, though at a lower rate than the laws drafted from the other House. Similarly, it revises an d examines bills passed from the House of Commons, checking the proposals, making changes and improving bills through debates on amendments, which is not time limited, making them workable once approved. In its legislative function, the House of Lords power to veto a bill are not available, but they can reject it to cause delay, allow room for review by the Common House and government, or offer alternative amendments (The Great Britain Parliament et al, 2012). However, in the third time reject by the House of Lords, the Common House can push it ahead for the crowns approval, even without the consent of the House of Lords. Scrutinising government and its executives: It is a valuable role that helps keep the government executives and operations in the right track. Most of the government activities and decisions are challenged by the House of Lords, which probes into a wide range of policies and regulations. As an executive body, it has the powers to question ministers and elicit infor mation from the administration by submitting written questions, or asking them orally during the question time sessions in the House, raise issues of concern through debates about government activities and policies, and provide responses to the government statements (The Great Britain Parliament et al, s2012). The House has established committees that assist in scrutinising and monitoring the delegated powers to the executives and government. They